Adolescents, their relationship with teachers and coping skills to adjust to teacher classroom management strategies.

School days we have all been there  (accessed from Shutterstock)
School days we have all been there (accessed from Shutterstock)

The classroom, as a social setting for learning, provides a dynamic, yet bounded, set of conditions that engage and affect the learning process. These conditions serve either to support or constrain development of learners (Grossman, Smagorinsky & Valencia, 1999; Martin 2004). From this sociocultural perspective learning is viewed as an active process in which knowledge and meanings are constructed and reconstructed through participation in social interactions (Cole, 1996; Lave & Wenger, 1991; Lemke, 1997; Marshall, 1992; Rogoff et al., 1995; Vygotsky, 1978; Wertsch, 1985; 1998). Thus engagement in the classroom as a learning environment is an important contributor to success of being able to negotiate the world and meaning making. It is then Important for students to connect to the learning environment and indeed the teachers who lead and facilitate learning opportunities. This highlights the significance of student connection to teachers and learning, and thus relationships in the learning environment.

As Bourdieu (1986) reminds us, relationships, produced through reciprocal exchanges are repositories for social capital. Furthermore, an individual’s ability to benefit socially and/or academically may be reliant on resources such as information, norms, and support converted through relationships (Bourdieu, 1986; Coleman, 1988; Crosnoe, 2004). For the classroom this is extremely important and highlights how learning experiences are organised in relation to how they impact students in schools and how they engage with teachers, content, and indeed each other (Hopkins, 2001; Hopkins, Munro & Craig, 2011).

Student academic and social success may significantly benefit through the provision of classroom supports such as established norms of expectations, trust, communication, and engagement (Crosnoe, 2004; Stanton-Salazar, 1997). Student-teacher communications may also be indicators of the internalized expectations and trust levels teachers have of students (Good & Brophy, 2003). Crucial to the classroom, these communications transmit norms, which can positively or negatively affect student-teacher relationships (Stanton-Salazar, 1997). Furthermore, Muller (2001) states that the probability that an educator can produce a supportive classroom environment is affected by the quality of individual student-teacher interactions.  Thus, indicating that a supportive classroom is built on social relationships that should nurture students’ sense of belonging (Murray & Zvoch, 2011; Sergiovanni, 2005) which can then increase student classroom engagement levels, students’ beliefs of their own academic and social capabilities (Fan, Williams, & Corkin, 2011; Larson, 2014; Lee, 2012; Patrick, Ryan, & Kaplan, 2007; Thapa, Cohen, Guffey, & Higgins-D’Alessandro, 2013) as well as classroom responsibility (Lewis, 2011). Subsequently, if a teacher is perceived to alienate students this can lead to disconnection within the classroom (Brown, Higgins & Paulson, 2003). In order to generate effective social classroom environments, both students and teachers need to sustain reciprocal relationships through an acceptance of obligations to and expectations of the other party (Bryk & Schnider, 2002). This is essentially important, as Sullivan et al (2014) reveal in their research, that of all unproductive behaviours that occur in classrooms, disengaged behaviours by students are extremely prevalent and teachers consider them difficult to manage.

Maintaining orderly learning environments is important because they are associated with high student engagement and achievement (Angus et al., 2009; Creemers, 1994; Hattie, 2003; Lewis, Romi, Qui, & Katz, 2005; Overton & Sullivan, 2008; Sullivan, 2009; Sullivan et al., 2014). Hattie (2003) reminds us that:

 …an optimal classroom climate for learning is one that generate an atmosphere of trust – a climate in which it is understood that it is okay to make mistakes, because mistakes are the essence of learning…expert teachers create classroom climates that welcome admission of errors; they achieve this by developing a climate of trust between teacher and student, and between student and student. (p.29)

Illuminated in this quote is that a classroom environment built on trust comes from focus on relationships, engagement, and responsible classroom behaviour. This is where Pearson et al. (2008) reiterate that relationships “create unique and often lasting attachments among individuals … that influence behaviors such as cooperation, communication, and commitment to a common purpose” (p. 958).

Importance is highlighted then for students to adapt to teacher expectations and style in order to be able to negotiate the student-teacher relationships and to adapt to the requirements of school. As Hanewald (2013), and Mello and Nader (2013) reiterate, students are required to learn to act responsibly towards others and towards their learning across all age levels and transition times of schooling (for example, from kindergarten to primary, primary to secondary, or so on). Adjustment, therefore, requires coping skills to be manifested by young people (Davis & Humphrey, 2012; Keefer, Parker, & Saklofske, 2009) in order to be able to negotiate relevant expectations and thus display appropriate and responsible social behaviour. As equally important to the classroom environment and student responsibility is also teacher use of engagement and management strategies. If there is not the appropriate classroom management strategies utilised by the teacher disconnection by the student can be present. A lack of positive student-teacher relationships in the classroom may cause students to experience a disconnection (Angus et al., 2009; Creemers, 1994; Hattie, 2003; Lewis, Romi, Qui, & Katz, 2005; Overton & Sullivan, 2008; Sullivan, 2009; Sullivan et al., 2014; Trahan, 2013). In a study by Trahan (2013) with Grade 6 and 7 students (aged 11 to 13 years) findings specified that when disconnection occurs, students may become disengaged. This disengagement subsequently produces difficulties in developing self-efficacy which facilitate potential academic and/or social growth.

We argue in the research we have carried out with over 1000 adolescents in Australia is that student coping is a mediator of disconnection in the face of teachers’ classroom management. Coping strategies utilised by young people relates to their manifestation of appropriate social behaviour. This is important as coping skills are closely connected to adaptation, social functioning, and social, physical and emotional health (Hanewald, 2013; Hines, 2007; Lasarus & Folkman, 1987; Mello & Nader, 2013). Discrepancies in social skills and social competence, including coping and adaption, can lead to adjustment issues and behavioral problems in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood (Bru et al., 2010; Elizur, 1986; Hines, 2007; Kolbe, Collin & Cortese, 1997; Mello & Nader, 2013; Spence, 2003). In this research it will be assumed that effective coping may lead to appropriate adjustment, and be used as a mediator of disconnection in the face of teachers’ classroom management. We highlight that there is a productivity connection between time on task and achievement for the student and therefore anything to do with the teacher and their classroom management strategies. However teacher use of aggression and thus subsequent distraction leads to a tension between the teacher-student relationship (Lewis, Romi & Roache, 2012). As a result students coping strategies assist in the adaptation to liking school, what the teacher pedagogical displays and manifests in the learning environment as a part of their classroom management strategies.

This research findings highlight the significant relationship between teacher and student. Regardless of gender those students who utilise Productive coping strategies are significantly more likely to like their teacher and to express more interest in learning and the belief that it is important. Findings also indicated that these students are more likely to remain attentive when their teacher enacts classroom management strategies to address responsible behaviour of peers. In contrast those adolescents who utilise Non-Productive coping strategies indicated that they are less likely to like their teacher and believe that learning is interesting. This non-engagement is a significant reinforcement of why teaching adolescents coping skills and how these skills can support both academic, social and emotional development is vital (Larson, 2014; Lee, 2012). If those students are utilising Non-Productive coping strategies, do not believe in learning as an interesting endeavor and thus have greater distraction as a result of teachers dealing with misbehavior in class, the maintaining of a productive and supportive classroom community where all learners can succeed according to their needs and learning styles is impacted. It could be assumed that the adolescents in need of a positive teacher-student relationship in the classroom environment to scaffold learning are the ones who are, distracted and indeed the target of the teachers classroom management that in turn is making them feel disengaged with liking learning. Whether the teacher behaviour and classroom management strategies are justified or not, for the student this is a significant issue where crucial life long learning is disrupted and impeded. These findings highlight the significance of student connection to teachers and learning, and thus relationships in the learning environment. The findings of this research reinforce how important it is to teach adolescents coping strategies. The findings contribute to the evidence that teaching adolescents to improve their coping results in positive outcomes (Carter, 2010; Frydenberg, 2004; Frydenberg & Lewis, 1999a; 1999b; 2002; Lemon et al., 2004; Meller & Nader, 2013) and influences responsible behaviour (Cook, Tankersley & Landrum, 2012; Holen et al., 2012; MacCann et a., 2012; Mikolajczak, Petrides, & Hurry, 2009) and their sense of positive student-teacher relationships (Wang & Eccles, 2011; Wigfield & Cambria 2010).


What are your thoughts about the student-teacher relationship and impact on classroom responsibility?

How can teacher pedagogical decisions engage all learners, but especially those who feel disconnected?

How can we meaningfully teach coping skills to young people?

What are your experiences?



Angus, M., McDonald, T., Ormond, C., Rybarcyk, R., Taylor, A., & Winterton, A. (2009). Trajectories of classroom behaviour and academic progress: A study of student engagement with learning. Mount Lawley. Western Australia: Edith Cowan University.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In Richardson, J.G. (Ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood.

Brown, M. R., Higgins, K., & Paulsen, K. (2003). Adolescent alienation: What is it and what can educators do about it? Intervention in School & Clinic, 39, 3-7.

Bru, E., Stornes, T., Munthe, E., & Thuen, E. (2010). Student’s perceptions of teacher support across the transition from primary to secondary school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(6), 519-533.

Bryk, A. & Schnider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Carter, A. (2010). Evaluating the Best of Coping Program: Enhancing coping skills in adolescents. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 479. Retrieved from

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Coleman, J.S. (1988). Sociological and economic approaches to the analysis of social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1988), 95-120.

Cook, B., Tankersley, M, & Landrum, T. J. (2012). Classroom Behavior, Contexts, and Interventions. UK: Emerald.

Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.

Crosnoe, R. (2004). Social Capital and the Interplay of Families and Schools. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), pp. 267-280.

Davis, S. K., & Humphrey, N. (2012). The influence of emotional intelligence (EI) on coping and mental health in adolescence: Divergent roles for trait and ability EI. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1369-1379.

Elizur, J. (1986). The stress of school entry: parental coping behaviours and children’s adjustment to school. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 27, 625–638.

Fan, W., Williams, C. M., & Corkin, D. M. (2011). A multilevel analysis of student perceptions of school climate: The effect of social and academic risk factors. Psychology in the Schools, 48(6), 632-647.

Frydenberg E. (2004). Coping competences: What to teach and when. Theory Into Practice, 43: 14-22.

Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (2002). Adolescent well-being: Building young people’s resources. (pp.175-194). In E. Frydenberg. (Ed.). Beyond coping: Meeting goals, vision and challenge. UK: Oxford University Press.

Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (1999a). The adolescent coping scale: Construct validity and what the instrument tells us. Australian Journal of Guidance Counselling, 9, 19-36.

Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (1999b). Things don’t get better just because you’re older: A case for facilitating reflection. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 81-94.

Good, T., & Brophy, J. (2003). Looking in classrooms (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Grossman, P.L., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Approaching tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108, 1-29.

Hanewald, R. (2013). Transition between primary and secondary school: why is it important and how can it be supported. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 62-74.

Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality, Melbourne, Australia.

Hines, M.T. (2007). Adolescent adjustment to the middle school transition: The intersection of divorce and gender in review. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 31(2), 1-15.

Holen, S., Waaktaar, T., Lervåg, A., & Ystgaard, M. (2012). The effectiveness of a universal school-based programme on coping and mental health: a randomised, controlled study of Zippy’s Friends. Educational Psychology, 32(5), 657-677.

Hopkins, D. (2001). School Improvement for Real. London: RoutiedgeFalmer.

Hopkins, D., Munro, J., & Craig, W. (Ed.s). Powerful Learning: A Strategy for Systemic Educational Improvement. Melbourne: Australia Council for Educational Research.

Keefer, K. V., Parker, J. D. A., & Saklofske, D. H. (2009). Emotional intelligence and physical health. (pp. 191–218). In C. Stough, D. H. Saklofske, & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), Assessing emotional intelligence: Theory, research, applications. New York: Springer.

Larson, A. (2014). How Student-Teacher Relationships Influence School Climate: A Literature Review. Accessed from

Lasarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1, 141-169.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, J. (2012). The effects of the teacher–student relationship and academic press on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 330-340.

Lemke, J. (1997). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In D. Kirshner, & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 37–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lemon, N., Frydenberg, E., & Poole, C. (2004) Saving students from music performance anxiety. In Frydenberg, E. (Ed.) Thriving Surviving or Going Under: Coping With Everyday Lives. Charlotte, USA: Information Age Publishing.

Lewis, R. (2011). The developmental management approach to classroom behaviour. (pp.96- 108). In D. Hopkins, J. Munro, & W. Craig. (Ed.s). Powerful Learning: A Strategy for Systemic Educational Improvement. Melbourne: Australia Council for Educational Research.

Lewis, R., & Romi, S., & Roache, J. (2012). Excluding students from classroom: Teacher techniques that promote student responsibility. Teaching and Teacher Education. 28(2012), 870-878.

Lewis, R., Romi, S., Qui, X., & Katz, J. (2005). Teachers’ classroom discipline and student misbehaviour in Australia, China and Israel. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 729-741.

MacCann, C., Lipnevich, A. A., Burrus, J., Roberts, R. D. (2012). The best years of our lives? Coping with stress predicts school grades, life satisfaction, and feelings about high school. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(2), 235-241.

Marshall, H. H. (1992). Seeing, redefining, and supporting student learning. In H. H. Marshall (Ed.), Redefining student learning: Roots of educational change (pp. 1–32). Norwood,NJ: Ablex.

Martin, S.D. (2004). Finding balance: impact of classroom management conceptions on developing teacher practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 405–422.

Mello, C., & Nadar, K. (2013). Teaching coping and social skills to elementary school children. (pp.103-126). In K. Nadar. (Ed.). School Rampage Shootings and Other Youth Disturbances: Early Preventative Interventions. London: Routledge.

Mikolajczak, M., Petrides, K. V., & Hurry, J. (2009). Adolescents choosing self-harm as an emotion regulation strategy: the protective role of trait emotional intelligence. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48(2), 181–193.

Muller, C. (2001). The role of caring in the teacher-student relationship for at-risk students. Sociological Inquiry, 71(2), 241-255.

Murray, C., & Zvoch, K. (2011). The Inventory of Teacher-Student Relationships: Factor structure, reliability and validity among African American youth in low-income urban schools. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(4), 493–525.

Overton, L. Y., & Sullivan, A. M. (2008). Non-compliance in a democratic classroom: Is it prevalent? Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education International Education Research Conference, Brisbane, Qld.

Patrick, H., Ryan, A., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early Adolescents’ Perceptions of the Classroom Social Environment, Motivational Beliefs, and Engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (1), 83–98.

Pearson, A. W., Carr, J. C., and Shaw, J. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 949-969

Rogoff, B., Baker-Sennett, J., Lacasa, P., & Goldsmith, D. (1995). Development through participation in sociocultural activity. New Directions for Child Development, 67, 45–65.

Sergiovanni, T. (2005). Strengthening the heartbeat leading and learning together in schools. California: Josey-Bass.

Spence, S.H. (2003). Social skills training with children and young people: Theory, evidence and practice. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 8(2), 84-96.

Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 1-41.

Sullivan, A. M. (2009). How can teachers enable students to become empowered? Curriculum Perspectives, 29(1), 53-63.

Sullivan, A.M., Johnson, B., Owens, L., & Conway, R. (2014). Punish them or engage them? Teachers’ views of unproductive student behaviours in the classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 43-56.

Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357-385.

Trahan, M.N. (2013). A Conceptual and Measurement Model of Student-Teacher Classroom Social Capital: An Exploration of Relationships. Accessed September 11, 2014 from

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wang, M-T., & Eccles, J.S. (2011). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28(December), 12-23.

Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35.




One Comment Add yours

  1. Britt Gow says:

    Hi Narelle,
    Great post about student resilience, attitudes to learning and classroom environment – I also agreed with @whatedsaid’s “9 Tweets that don’t add value” post. Jan Molloy recommended on Twitter that I contact you regarding Pre-Service Teacher videos. I am a science and maths teacher at a small rural school in SW Victoria. Over the past few years I have been working with ABC Splash to develop and promote their (free) curriculum aligned videos, games and other resources.
    I am just wondering if you know of any PST webinars, TeachMeets or other forums where I may be able to share some of these resources on behalf of ABC Splash?
    Best Regards, Britt Gow

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s